home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT2096>
- <title>
- Aug. 23, 1993: The Political Interest
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Aug. 23, 1993 America The Violent
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- The Political Interest, Page 26
- Good Cops for Less
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By Michael Kramer
- </p>
- <p> Did you notice the cops standing behind Bill Clinton as the
- President unveiled his crime-fighting package last week? Almost
- all were from the neighborhood, from Washington and its surrounding
- suburbs. That's no big deal, of course; any blue will do for
- a law-and-order photo-op. But the absence of officers from all
- over the U.S. (the norm for decades whenever uniforms have gathered
- to support a President's latest war on crime) tells a tale.
- Clinton's proposals, a grab bag of familiar notions, were hastily
- introduced. That doesn't mean they're bad or ill conceived--the Administration worked on them for months--but the speed
- of their introduction is all about politics, a desire to trump
- the anticrime initiatives that Senate Republican leader Bob
- Dole announced on Aug. 4.
- </p>
- <p> Unfortunately, Clinton has shortchanged one of the few truly
- new (and good) ideas in years--the Police Corps proposal authored
- by Adam Walinsky, a New York lawyer who served as Robert Kennedy's
- top aide. Like ROTC, the Police Corps would offer a swap. Each
- year, competitively selected high school seniors would win federal
- financing for their college education; in exchange, they would
- serve four years as local police officers after graduation.
- The corps promises four benefits:
- </p>
- <p> 1) Compared with regular cops, they would be a bargain. It costs
- about $55,000 a year to pay and equip the average officer. Primarily
- because of reduced pension benefits, corps members would cost
- about a third less. 2) Many urban police forces have trouble
- attracting qualified minority recruits. A Justice Department
- survey has concluded that many inner-city youths would gravitate
- to the corps' service-for-college trade. 3) The infusion of
- college graduates would improve the overall educational level
- of local police forces. 4) Perhaps most important, says Walinsky,
- "a sizable number of civilians, the kinds of kids who are going
- to end up as lawyers or business leaders, will learn about police
- work firsthand and support it throughout their lives. And they,
- at least, will have ingrained the habits of self-defense and
- courage in a country dying from fear."
- </p>
- <p> Candidate Clinton portrayed himself as the Police Corps's biggest
- fan and regularly crowed that he was the first Governor to create
- a Walinsky-style program--but Arkansas' college-for-service
- deal won't start until 1997. Now President Clinton has asked
- for $100 million over four years for a total of about 3,000
- corps members. "Given the crime wave," says Walinsky, "referring
- to this as a step in the right direction, as Clindoes, is like
- Franklin Roosevelt calling for 100 new tanks in 1941." Dole,
- who wants $250 million for the same purpose, identifies the
- resistance: The police chiefs "want regular cops, the kind they're
- used to. They also want to spend on new, high-tech stuff," the
- wrong emphasis, says Dole, because "what we need are more cops
- on the beat," to deter crime by their presence and to catch
- those who aren't deterred.
- </p>
- <p> Dole is right, concedes a White House aide, "but we didn't want
- to take on the chiefs. Maybe Congress will push us. In fact,
- we wouldn't mind the proposal of those other Senators," a bipartisan
- group urging a full-blown Police Corps that would cost about
- $1.2 billion annually.
- </p>
- <p> That's no small change, but it would be money well spent. "We're
- losing the streets," says Boston police commissioner Bill Bratton.
- That isn't news to those who walk them, and it's the best reason
- to establish the Police Corps at levels that can make a difference.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-